This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hurley, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hurley, J. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Endotoxemia and Gram-negative bacteremia as predictors of outcome in sepsis: a meta-analysis using ROC curves

Division of Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia, drjch{at}ncable.net.au

The prognostic value of the detection of endotoxin in plasma of patients with suspected Gram-negative sepsis is unclear despite numerous studies. Sixteen studies have reported endotoxemia detection and blood culture results with outcome data for 1937 patients with suspected Gram-negative sepsis. Comparisons of the fatality rates for the subgroups of patients with, respectively, either endotoxemia (group 3), or Gram-negative bacteremia (group 2), or both detected (group 1), versus the fatality rate for the subgroup of patients with these factors absent (group 4), were made based on summary odds ratios (and 95% CI). Summary odds ratios for the comparison of group 2 versus group 4 and group 3 versus group 4 were non-significant (2.2; 0.9-5.8 and 2.0; 0.8-4.8, respectively). The summary odds ratio was significant for group 1 versus group 4 (3.6; 2.1-6.3), and more so among studies in which non-Enterobacteriaceae were common among the Gram-negative blood culture isolates (4.8; 2.1-10.7). Endotoxemia, like Gram-negative bacteremia, is a weak prognostic indicator. Endotoxemia appears to have most prognostic significance when it is detected in the co-presence of Gram-negative bacteremia. The differing interpretations among published studies could be attributed to the variability in types of Gram-negative bacteremia observed.

Journal of Endotoxin Research, Vol. 9, No. 5, 271-279 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/09680519030090050201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?