|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Lipopolysaccharidecell interaction and induced cellular activation in whole blood of septic patients
Reinaldo Salomao
Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, rsalomaodipa{at}pesquisa.epm.br
Milena K.C. Brunialti
Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Esper G. Kallás
Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Paulo S. Martins
Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Otelo Rigato
Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Marina Freudenberg
Max-Planck-Institute of Immunobiologie, Freiburg, Germany
We used biotinylatedLPS (LPSb) and flow cytometry to study LPSmonocyte interaction and LPS-induced cellular activation in whole blood from septic patients (SP). Expression of surface activation markers was evaluated on monocytes (HLA-DR) and T lymphocytes (CD69 and CD95), and intracellular TNF- on monocytes. Saturating curve and kinetics of LPSb detection on monocytes were similar in SP and healthy volunteers (HV). LPSb bound to monocytes was detected after 5 min of incubation in both groups, with a more pronounced decay in SP. Monocytes from SP had a lower expression of HLA-DR as compared to HV, both constitutive and upon LPS stimulation. The proportion of monocytes producing TNF- after LPS stimulus was higher in HV than SP (mean ± SD = 25.2 ± 14.2% and 2.2 ± 2.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). LPS-induced CD69 on T CD8+ and CD8 lymphocytes was similar for patients and controls. Expression of CD95 on T lymphocytes was higher in SP as compared to HV on T CD8+ cells (GMFI, mean ± SD = 22.3 ± 14.6 and 8.6 ± 5.0, respectively, P = 0.01) and CD8 cells (GMFI, mean ± SD = 28.3 ± 7.7 and 14 ± 4.3 respectively, P < 0.001). Thus, monocytes and lymphocytes seem to respond differently to LPS in septic patients. Monocyte hyporesponsiveness appears not to be related to a decreased binding capacity of LPS, but rather to an impaired signal transduction.
Journal of Endotoxin Research, Vol. 8, No. 5,
371-379 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/09680519020080051101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|