Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Endotoxin Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Opal, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Opal, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Minireview: Therapeutic intervention in sepsis with antibody to endotoxin: is there a future?

A.S. Cross

Department of Bacterial Disease, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington DC, USA, Division of Infectious Diseases, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Department of Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA

S. Opal

Department of Bacterial Disease, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington DC, USA, Division of Infectious Diseases, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Department of Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA

Within the last 24 months a number of studies that tested the efficacy of immunologic reagents in the treatment of sepsis were concluded. Among these reports were 4 studies1-4 completed on 2 anti-endotoxin monoclonal antibodies (MAb, HA-1A and E-5). These clinical trials did not generate data sufficient to support product licensure. Given the attention and expectations surrounding the anti-endotoxin MAbs, the disappointing results raised the question whether the use of anti-endotoxin antibodies in the treatment of sepsis was still a viable concept.5 The question was rendered even more relevant given the decade-old controversy surrounding the efficacy of polyclonal antibodies to endotoxin, particularly antibody to the J5 (Rc chemotype) mutant of Escherichia coli 0111:B4, a conceptual progenitor of the HA-1A and E-5 MAbs.6 In this review we shall examine whether anti-endotoxin antibodies may yet offer any therapeutic potential in the treatment of sepsis. It will be our contention that antibodies to core glycolipid will be useful adjuncts to therapy, particularly if used as part of combination immunotherapy.

Journal of Endotoxin Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 57-69 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/096805199400100110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
R. Silverstein, W.M. Johnson, S.E. Bucklin, and D.C. Johnson
The protein kinase C activator PMA modulates LPS lethality in normal mice and protects against LPS lethality in D-galactosamine-sensitized mice
Innate Immunity, February 1, 1996; 3(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
P.H. Lagrange, H.S. Blanchard, and A. Felten
Review: Bacterial endotoxin and the human monoclonal antibody HA-IA: specificity, potential mechanisms of action, and limits to its effectiveness
Innate Immunity, October 1, 1995; 2(5): 371 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]